Orthogonal Array Testing. Report a Bug. Previous Prev. Next Continue. Home Testing Expand child menu Expand. SAP Expand child menu Expand. Web Expand child menu Expand. Must Learn Expand child menu Expand.
Big Data Expand child menu Expand. Live Project Expand child menu Expand. The difference between these two very similar approaches of pairwise vs. I have studied the question of how can software testing inputs be combined most efficiently and effectively pretty steadily for the last 7 years. I started by searching the web for "Design of Experiments" and "software testing" and found references to Dr.
Madhav Phadke who, by coincidence, turns out was a former student of my father. I discovered that Dr. I used RDExpert to create test sets and compared those test sets against sets of tests that had been selected manually by software testers.
I gathered results by asking one tester to execute the manually selected tests and another tester to execute the the Orthogonal Array-based tests; the OA-based tests dramatically outperformed the manually-selected ones in terms of defects found per tester hour and defexts found overall. So, in short, I had confirmed to my satisfaction that an OA-based test data combination strategy was far more effective than manually selecting combinations for the kinds of projects I was working on, but I was curious if other techniques worked better.
Orthogonal Arrays are more efficient and effective for manufacturing, and agriculture, and advertising, and many other settings. And we have built Hexawise as a software tool to help software producers test their software , based on what I have learned from my experience. We take full advantage of the greatly increased efficiency and effectiveness of letting testers to determine what needs to be tested and software algorithms to quickly create comprehensive test plans that provide more coverage with dramatically fewer tests.
But we also go well beyond this to create a software as a service solution that aids the software testing team with many huge advantages such as: automatically generating Expected Results in test scripts , automated importing of data from Excel or mind maps , exporting tests into other tools , preventing impossible to test for values from appearing together , and much more.
Pairwise testing almost always requires fewer tests than orthogonal array-based solutions it is possible, in some situations, for them to have an equal number of tests. The "cost" of the extra tests AKA experiments is worth paying in many settings outside of the software testing industry because the results are non-binary in those tests.
Someone seeking a desired darkness and gloss and luminosity and luster for a particular shade of green in the processing of film, for example, would benefit from with the information obtained from the added information gathered from orthogonal arrays. In software testing, however, the added costs imposed by the the extra tests are not worth it.
You're generally not seeking some ideal point in a continuum; you're looking to see what two specific pieces of data will trigger a defect when they appear in the same transaction. In complex applications, these factors can shoot up which makes the testing process complex. For testing complex Applications, the QA tester needs to write test cases for each combination of the factors which becomes a tedious and herculean task to accomplish.
Adopting testing strategies that depend upon pairwise-generated test cases encompass all combinations, which could effectively cover the business scenario and is still very effective in uncovering bugs. Test cases cover all possible combinations for the given parameters in inefficient and optimal manner. OATS testing can be defined as a methodical, statistical method of testing pair-wise interactions. It offers in depth and evenly distributed coverage for all variable pairs.
OATS testing makes use of an array of values signifying variable factors that are merged pair-wise. Usual testing methods represent all arrangements of factors and levels, which increases the number of test cases.
OATS testing technique is usually used in intricate applications and web applications. If the AUT involves large number of factors and each factor consists of more number of values, it will make the testing process quite difficult. Black box testing will not be enough to offer enough testing coverage. Therefore, test cases are found out for A1 and A2 first and they come out Then A1 pairs up with A3.
Then A2 pairs up with A3 so that no combination is repeated simultaneously and all probable combinations are covered.
0コメント